A_Troll

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 570 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Remove FPS HARD cap from wot #113997
    A_Troll
    Member
    Just now, CuntyBollox said:

    u would…thrs no boobs involved….

    How can you say there are no boobs when you are involved?

    in reply to: Remove FPS HARD cap from wot #113995
    A_Troll
    Member
    4 minutes ago, CuntyBollox said:

    just like thee slim…..

    I thought I was complicated lol.

    in reply to: Remove FPS HARD cap from wot #113988
    A_Troll
    Member

    I think he was asking why, if this is so simple, no-one has thought to put this here before. It was a compliment.

    Simple, but VERY good.

    in reply to: About Plazma’s blog #113958
    A_Troll
    Member

    I’m sad to see him do this.

    A_Troll
    Member
    5 hours ago, Nonesense said:

    So i guess i jst do install a second World of tanks somewehere else?

    Do i need to rename it in something hidden? :D

     

    Yes.

    No need to hide it. A seperate installation will give that client a unique client ID.

    5 hours ago, PlazmaKeks said:

    So if several people play on the same PC WoT, they will get flagged ?

    WG really has to work on this strategy. What if I have 3 kids and we all play WoT ? (WG logic: do not have children playing our game :) )

    Yes. They might get flagged. If one is cheating and they are all using the same client the others will get looked at.

    We all know that WG does not need a reason to ban anyone. They can ban you because they think you DESERVE a ban. If you are using many accounts on the same client you might get banned just for that……. because they can. It’s not fair but they need no proof and will not give you any. To be fair, the community offices do not even get data as to why you are banned. They just get a list from Minsk. “Ban these players”.

    If every player who got banned filed a police report for theft, sooner or later one of them will get investigated and WG will have to provide proof. Trying to sue does not work unless you have lots of money. Police reports do.

    A_Troll
    Member

    WG detects players using client IDs. Every game client has a unique ID number. Reinstalling the client will change the client ID or install several clients at different places on your PC. I run 6 different accounts on 3 clients. Although I use 2 accounts for each client I have never got flagged for multiple accounts. I have got 2 accounts banned for cheating and they were using the the same client. So…… if you are cheating on one account there is a reasonable possibility that the other account on that client might get looked at.

    WG does not look at IPs anymore except in extreme cases because most players use dynamic IPs. WG does allow family members to use the same client. This is documented, so if you are flagged for multiple accounts send a ticket and lie. lol.

    The refer a friend program is a problem if you want to use it. The bonuses are available if you platoon and that is hard to do with yourself. There are other bonuses you can get but you have to grind your “friend” to tier 10. If you want to get a friend bonus, ask someone you know who can play with you.

    In short. VPNs will make no difference as the IP you download the client on makes no difference. People on the same network can play as much as they want. Using the same client MIGHT get you flagged but I don’t know of anyone getting banned for just that.

    in reply to: Army Rank Mark Of Excellence #113393
    A_Troll
    Member
    On 2017-10-18 at 10:09 PM, BobC said:

    5 star General v a 4 leaf clover.

    Should I have gone to “Spec Savers For U”.

    Perhaps I seen that display wrongly as a form of dyslexia?

    My apology if it was.

     

    I don’t think a 4 leaved clover is the same as an oak leaf Bob.

    in reply to: [1.17.1.0 #1321] interface. #111652
    A_Troll
    Member

    No! Make me. xD

    in reply to: Are these mods detected? #113408
    A_Troll
    Member
    5 hours ago, WHYPHY said:

    …. after you right-click ;)

    Details details. xD

    in reply to: Are these mods detected? #113406
    A_Troll
    Member
    10 hours ago, BobC said:

    If only I knew how to use an aimbot O.o

    Aimbot explaination by A_Troll.

    1. Without an aimbot you just point and shoot.

    2. With an aimbot you don’t need to point……… and it auto-shoots.

     

    in reply to: Banwave September 2017 #113384
    A_Troll
    Member

    Oh my.

    WG bans players in the banwaves. How many of those in the banwaves were for illegal mods? Many? A few? Some? No-one knows.

    WG bans people when they genuinely were not cheating. They do not ban people who ARE cheating. They do not prove anything. They do not allow appeal. They ban whoever they choose……. yes….. CHOOSE. They say in the FPP to trust them. How can they be trusted if even ONE of those bans was wrong and the poor player cannot appeal?  Without proof there is no crime.

    WG cannot detect the modpacks here. If they could EVERYONE using them would be banned. D’oh. 

    10 hours ago, BobC said:

    Follow my lead. Pm me and I will take off my tinfoil hat :PxD

    You have to buy me dinner first.

    in reply to: Are these mods detected? #113404
    A_Troll
    Member

    BW mods are not detected. zj mods are detected. It seems that WG is detecting aimbots by looking at behaviour. They then use a second stage process to confirm use of illegal mods. Be carefull HOW you use an aimbot to skip the second stage.

    in reply to: Banwave September 2017 #113382
    A_Troll
    Member

    That’s very useful. Looks like they are detecting aimbot behavior to flag the confirmation phase.

    Thoughts on this are probably detection by “hidden snapping” or “weak spot search” twitching. If any of the BW team is interested in how I think they do it, send a PM so I can share a theory. Not gonna answer people I don’t know , sorry. I wanna discuss it first with people who know more than me in case I look silly later.

    in reply to: Banwave September 2017 #113378
    A_Troll
    Member
    14 hours ago, grahamcracker said:

    we had a ban thread.

    <iframe allowfullscreen="" class="ipsEmbed_finishedLoading" data-controller="core.front.core.autosizeiframe" data-embedcontent="" data-embedid="embed1925321061" scrolling="no" src="/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&controller=topic&id=1534&do=embed” style=”height: 205px; overflow: hidden; max-width: 502px;”>

    why make a new one?

    Experience. Last banwaves we had multiple threads related to each wave. This was an attempt to collect all the data in one thread. The title sticks out more and encourages people to use it.

    CuntyBollox’s thread had some valid points so it grew too. We were lucky we only had 2 threads this time……… and yet people complain……..

    in reply to: Banwave September 2017 #113371
    A_Troll
    Member

    Seemed to me that the playerbase in NA started to decline as soon as Meathead started to make videos.

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 570 total)