cuntybollox
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I’m sorry to say that my rig is an owd steam engine of a thing….it really shows a difference between running a xvm setup and using ur non xvm mods set (which is good work btw).
With xvm I get a frame stutter every time summat is spotted and the minimap updates (via xvm I think??….maybe wrong),I also get disconnects @ battle start sometimes ( battle loads…takes ages to load…..entry point to battle is drawn then d/c……sometimes 2 or 3 times in a row…..) or if not then the start timer has run out and my plat m8’s are half a map away in at2’s and I’m just starting to move……..aaaaaaaarrrrrgghhhh….ffs…..
Dont get any of that shite if I dont use xvm…….have gone back and forth with this sooooooo many time over the last 5 yrs it’s unreal.
I know most of this is down to my owd bus but it shows up stutters u may miss with a far faster rig……but in saying that my clannie has an uber i7 rig and he gets the minimap spot stutters too….but not the d/c probs……thats MINE….ALL FUCKING MINE…….meh….
7 hours ago, excitable said:Ive checked almost every file and as of right now there isn’t anything that is checking for mods when running a “Clean” game i.e. no mods at all.
The informer stuff is just a feedback for statistics on the new auto updater system i believe.
I ran full ZJ’s and Im still doing it and still havent been banned, I was also running Ace Tanker tracker.
…disabled WoT autoupdater and launcher by renaming it with.bak extention…..cos I dont trust it or the launcher anymore…
ace tanker tracker???….wotz dat?
xcpad I found to be a handy tool b4 I got notepad++…..what would be better would be a configurator like they used to have on the xvm site whr u can see the the graphics changes ur editing makes…..
….go on then….entertain us….whats it do????
…this fps drop has been an ongoing mare for the last 2 years or so………it seems talking to 2 sets of servers at the same is too much for the WG boyz to get their heads around….
…far better to dish a ban wave out to appear like they’re tackling the core problems with the game eh???….sorry did I say better instead of “EASIER”……oops…my bad…;)
6 hours ago, soulza said:lol oh so true…….. but it does appear (news coming in from sources) that the methods used to detect mods are not 100% legal on their behalf
…nudge,nudge…….”hey Igor you write the mod and we’ll pretend u dont exist and deny everything,dont write the mod and its the gulag for you and we still deny everything……oh yeah….and we shoot your parents too”
plausible denyability WG(kgb) style?
22 hours ago, soulza said:“….until they come clean about how they are gathering this info? ”
…errr not to piss on ur chips or owt Soulza…but the human race aint immortal……..yet….;)
2 hours ago, A_Troll said:1. It looks like SAE to me. That is why the numbers on the RU server are so high. There are far more using SAE there.
2. In 2 clients using identical XVM setups but different aimbots, only the one with SAE got banned.
3. Other mods get caught too but I haven’t figured those out yet. If the mod gets detected during client load it could be anything so perhaps the most common ones are most dangerous.
WG is talking about 1st wave / 2nd wave. I suspect that they have to configure the detection so they are only looking for a limited amount of mods in each wave, they then need to set new parameters.
If the detection is done in-game, looking at the players behavior, (aimpoints), that limits the types detectable to aim enhancing mods. (Looking for impossible locks or continued lock after “spot lost”.
…hmmmm….not sure….u and me use differenet modpacks…urs aslains with SAE on top mine helpics with SAE in pack…..
we both have the same mods ticked in each…..G mod,minimap destructibles etc..apart from the cosmectic diffs with each xvm config they are the same too.
The only diffs in the SAE’s are urs is a seperate mod dropped in and mine is built into the pack.
So is it a script hidden into ur modpack installer or is the reporting coming direct from the client?