Re: Luckystyle event
Published by Captdave on
BLACKWOT › Forums › Sales, Feedback and Information › Peer to Peer Technical Support › Luckystyle event › Re: Luckystyle event
On 5/5/2018 at 10:36 AM, A_Troll said:Disclaimer:
I do not work for BW in any way and my opinions belong to me and not the site.
No you didn’t. Lucky Style STOLE it. You can get the money back from Paypal by cancelling the transaction and reporting him for theft. Easy.
I understand that you are upset. But…… you need to stop waving your arms around. You are lucky that I am not Mauzer after you said that, even though you said (no offence). I was offended and a little shocked at that. If someone turns bad, everyone else he knows is bad too? I think not.
Kerry……. If a bank gets robbed, is that the fault of the bank, or the people that robbed it?
Let’s role play……….
If I went to a store and wanted to pay, then one of the workers tells me,
“Don’t pay there, pay HERE and I will give you 50% discount”.
Warning bells would start sounding in my ears. Then I have to make a decision…… do I pay full price or do I pay half and risk getting caught?
So….. if I pay half and get caught by the security guard on the way out….. who’s fault is that? The stores fault?
Where should I get my money back? I think you can figure that one out.
Recovering stolen money from Paypal is (sorta) easy. It will give you more satisfaction than moaning and complaining about it.
I’m sorry if I seem harsh, but I hate theives and I don’t know if you realize, but the developers need to be paid for us to use the mods. Lucky Style put that money in his pocket and didn’t give it to the site. Who has to pay developers fees instead to keep the site running? (They get paid per user). Yeah, Mauzer does. The guy just got royally screwed and you posted the quote above.
Hmmmmmf.
If a bank employee was the thief the bank would been responsible for all lost funds, If you want to use this analogy then u should refund or honor the accts setup by one of the web sites Mods employee’s. You use circular logic to deny that the the site who authorized Lucky to be a Mod is in fact responsible.